<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
 <channel> 
<title><![CDATA[RealClearPolitics - Articles by Karl Rove]]></title><link>http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/?id=14641#</link><description><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></description><category domain="14641#">Author</category><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's Policies Not Aligned with Public]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704094304575029081345559198.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704094304575029081345559198.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>It was a tense moment in the West Wing. Less than a year into a new president's term, a Senate seat was slipping to the opposition and taking with it the balance of power in the upper chamber. The president's agenda was suddenly at risk. </p><p>If this sounds like Republican Scott Brown's upset victory in Massachusetts last week, it was actually Vermont Sen. Jim Jeffords's defection in 2001. Mr. Jeffords's decision to bolt the party cost the GOP not the 60th vote, but a razor-thin majority. Yet following the defection, George W. Bush passed his signature tax-cut package, No Child Left Behind education reform, and a budget that cut in half the growth of discretionary domestic spending...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama vs. Bush on Spending]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704320104575015072822042394.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704320104575015072822042394.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>'If Massachusetts puts Brown in, it's a message of 'that's enough.' Let's stop the giveaways and let's get jobs going."</p><p>Marlene Connolly is a 73-year-old Massachusetts Democrat who cast her first vote for a Republican in supporting Scott Brown. Her quote and story comes to us via the New York Times, but she stands out for this reason: She shows us that those who actually cast ballots in the Bay State did so because they are frustrated with the administration's unrestrained federal spending and failed economic recovery policies. </p><p>View Full Image</p><p class="targetCaption">President Barack Obama</p><p>And here's what Washington needs to keep in mind as it debates the meaning...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama Misled Voters]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704362004575001082565645338.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704362004575001082565645338.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Americans learned last year that President Obama discards campaign promises like most people discard used Kleenex. Among the pledges he cast aside were reducing the deficit, reining in federal spending, not allowing lobbyists to work in his administration, increasing taxes only on those who make more than $250,000, and opposing "government-run health care" because it is "extreme."</p><p>This year, Mr. Obama is picking up where he left off. </p><p>Consider presidential signing statements. Since Andrew Jackson, presidents of both parties have told Congress that while they are signing a bill into law, they intend to ignore specific provisions because they involve unconstitutional...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[President Obama's Fiscal Fantasy World]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704842604574642212271767466.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704842604574642212271767466.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>After President Obama devoted much of 2009 to health care and global warming&quot;&rdquo;two issues far down Americans' list of concerns&quot;&rdquo;the White House says he will pivot to jobs and deficit reduction in his State of the Union speech in a few weeks. The White House is considering dramatic gestures, perhaps announcing a spending freeze or even a 2% or 3% reduction in nondefense spending. </p><p>But Americans shouldn't be misled by the election year ploy: Mr. Obama rigged the game by giving himself plenty of room to look tough on spending. He did that by increasing discretionary domestic spending for the last half of fiscal year 2009 by 8% and then increasing it another 12%...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[New Year's Resolutions for Washington]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704152804574628161441708216.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704152804574628161441708216.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama not only left Washington, D.C., for the holidays, but the lower 48 as well. So I thought I'd offer a few New Year's resolutions for him and others to come back to in the coming year.</p><p>First, to Mr. Obama's staff: The Norwegian Nobel Committee didn't want to wake the president to tell him about his prize earlier this year, but there shouldn't be any reluctance to reassure the nation after a terrorist attack. Also, why not resolve to have a few less "historic" moments? How many can one president really have, anyway? A little more grace toward his predecessor would help him, as would less TV time. He is wearing out his welcome and his speechwriters&quot;&rdquo;judging...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[The President is No B+]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704541004574600002289276662.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704541004574600002289276662.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama has won a place in history with the worst ratings of any president at the end of his first year: 49% approve and 46% disapprove of his job performance in the latest USA Today/Gallup Poll.</p><p>There are many factors that explain it, including weakness abroad, an unprecedented spending binge at home, and making a perfectly awful health-care plan his signature domestic initiative. But something else is happening. </p><p>Mr. Obama has not governed as the centrist, deficit-fighting, bipartisan consensus builder he promised to be. And his promise to embody a new kind of politics&quot;&rdquo;free of finger-pointing, pettiness and spin&quot;&rdquo;was a mirage. He has cheapened...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Can the GOP Retake the Senate in 2010?]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704240504574585921173928460.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704240504574585921173928460.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Democrats began the year as masters of the political universe, winning the White House and increasing their majorities in Congress. But the year is ending badly for them. Their top initiative, health care, is deeply unpopular. Congress's approval rating is 26%, Speaker Nancy Pelosi's is 28%, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's is an anemic 14%. </p><p>Political currents are running against the party of Barack Obama. Democrats now trail Republicans by four points in Gallup's generic ballot poll. In 1994, the year the GOP took control of Congress, it wasn't until March that Republicans took the lead in that poll&quot;&rdquo;and then only by one point and for a short period of time....]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama Can Win in Afghanistan]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574571852549048542.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574571852549048542.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama's speech on Tuesday night deserves to be cheered. Over the objections of his vice president and despite opposition from his political base, the president is sending an additional 30,000 troops to Afghanistan to fight terrorists.</p><p>But praise for Mr. Obama's decision needs to be qualified. Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, had said he could use as many as 40,000 troops, a figure he arrived at after carefully evaluating what would be needed to accomplish the mission Mr. Obama assigned him in June.</p><p>Mr. Obama hopes NATO can make up the difference between troops he's sending and the top number Gen. McChrystal asked for. So far,...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Voter Anger Is Building Over Spending]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574557571615004170.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574557571615004170.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>After engineering an unprecedented spending surge for nearly a year, President Barack Obama now wants to signal that he takes deficits seriously. So this week the White House announced that it is considering creating a commission to figure how to fix the budget mess.</p><p>Eureka!</p><p>Well, almost. What seems to concern the president is not the problem runaway spending poses for taxpayers and the economy. Rather, what bothers him is the political problem it poses for Democrats.</p><p>Last year, Mr. Obama made fiscal restraint a constant theme of his presidential campaign. "Washington will have to tighten its belt and put off spending," he said back then, while pledging to "go through...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[The Permanent Campaign Continues]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704204304574543670310106970.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704204304574543670310106970.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Every modern White House has put out news on contentious issues late on Friday in the hope that doing so will bury it, or reduce the amount of critical scrutiny it would otherwise receive. What is unusual is the degree to which this White House has relied on this tactic. </p><p>On Friday, Jan. 30, President Obama revoked the ban on giving taxpayer dollars to international groups that promote or perform abortions abroad. The president released his executive orders on detainee interrogations, closure of the Guantanamo prison, and new ethics rules during the previous week, his first in office.</p><p>On Friday, Feb. 27, Mr. Obama announced he would end U.S. combat activities in Iraq in 18...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama's Plan to Nationalize Midterms Could Backfire]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704402404574529583347899774.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704402404574529583347899774.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Republican victories in New Jersey and Virginia governors' races last week&quot;&rdquo;despite eight campaign appearances in the two states by President Barack Obama&quot;&rdquo;have unnerved Democrats. </p><p>Over the weekend, White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod tried to calm jittery Democrats who might go wobbly on the president's ambitious agenda by telling NBC's Chuck Todd that next year's congressional elections will be "nationalized." Because they "will be a referendum on this White House," he said, voters will turn out for Mr. Obama. Mr. Todd summed up Mr. Axelrod's plans by saying, "It's almost like a page from the Bush playbook of 2002."</p><p>I appreciate the reference....]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Tuesday's Suburban Vote Swing]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704013004574515652271599392.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704013004574515652271599392.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tuesday's elections should put a scare into red state Democrats&#8212;and a few blue state ones, too.</p><p>Barack Obama was said to have redrawn the electoral map by winning Virginia last year with 53% of the vote. On Tuesday, Republican Bob McDonnell flipped the state back to the GOP, winning his election for governor with 59% of the vote. Mr. Obama carried New Jersey easily last year with 57% of the vote. This year, despite being outspent 3-to-1, Republican Chris Christie ousted Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine there by 49% to 45%. Mr. Obama carried Pennsylvania last year by 10 points. On Tuesday, Republican Judge Joan Orie Melvin was elected to the state's Supreme Court by 53% to 47%,...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Obama Goes Wobbly on Afghanistan]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487241866434378.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487241866434378.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>In an interview with CNN's John King on Sunday, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said President Obama is now asking tough questions about Afghanistan "that have never been asked on the civilian side, the political side, the military side and the strategic side." It was a not so subtle dig at Mr. Obama's predecessor and was meant to distract from the White House's mishandling of the war.</p><p>The Bush administration did in fact conduct a top-to-bottom strategic review of Afghanistan in 2008. That review was provoked by two developments. </p><p>The first was that Pakistan's government wobbled starting in 2006. It cut deals with tribes that created safe havens for the Taliban and al...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Health Care Magic Collides With Reality]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574473372635087870.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574473372635087870.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that the Senate Finance Committee has voted for the health-care bill drafted by Montana Democratic Sen. Max Baucus, negotiations over the real bill can begin in Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's cozy Capitol hideaway. It won't be easy. </p><p>Democrats now face a central problem for any governing party: How to pass a major piece of legislation when there are a lot of sharply different ideas about what should be in it. Trying to reconcile what Democrats in the House prefer with what Democrats in the Senate want is already opening up divisions among the party's supporters.</p><p>This week, for example, leaders of 30 labor unions called for Democrats to reject Mr. Baucus's bill...]]></description>
				</item><item>
					<title><![CDATA[Voters Are Turning Away From Democrats]]></title>
					<link><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574459151157036912.html]]></link>
					<guid><![CDATA[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574459151157036912.html]]></guid>							
					<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Passing health-care reform could be harmful to the health of congressional Democrats.</p><p>Just look at how President Barack Obama's standing has fallen as he has pushed for reform. According to Fox News surveys, the number of independents who oppose health-care reform hit 57% at the end of September, up from 33% in July. Independents are generally a quarter of the vote in off-year congressional elections.</p><p>View Full Image</p><p>Among college graduates, opposition to health-care reform is now 50%, while only 33% support it, according to Gallup's Sept. 24 poll. College graduates are slightly more than a quarter of the off-year electorate.</p><p>Among seniors, opposition to ObamaCare...]]></description>
				</item></channel></rss>